dailies-editorials (1)

(EDITORIAL from The Korea Herald on June 19)

Seasonal stalemate

Korea must rethink minimum wage politics for a changing economy

Every summer, South Korea performs a ritual as predictable as the monsoon. Labor and business representatives gather, exchange familiar accusations and eventually settle on a compromise that satisfies neither side. The choreography rarely changes.

The economy beneath it, however, has changed profoundly.

Organized labor has proposed raising next year's minimum wage by 16.3 percent to 12,000 won ($7.90) an hour. Employers are again demanding industry-specific rates, arguing that a single nationwide standard no longer reflects reality.

The debate sounds familiar; the underlying economy does not.

South Korea's minimum wage, now 10,320 won, already ranks among the highest in East Asia. Yet the annual dispute has become more than an argument over purchasing power and business costs. It increasingly exposes an economy split between globally competitive industries and domestic sectors struggling to remain viable.

Workers have legitimate grievances. Average minimum wage increases over the past three years stood at 2.37 percent, below the average inflation rate of 2.66 percent. Real incomes for low-wage earners have therefore lost ground.

Semiconductor windfalls and widening asset inequality have reinforced perceptions of a two-speed economy. Against that backdrop, an hourly wage that barely covers the cost of a simple lunch in Seoul has become a tangible measure of how unevenly prosperity is distributed.

The same two-speed economy that frustrates workers also shapes employers' capacity to pay. According to employer groups, value added per worker in accommodation and food services is around 28 million won, barely one-sixth of manufacturing's 170 million won.

The strain is already visible. More than 31 percent of businesses in accommodation and food services failed to meet the statutory minimum wage last year.

That suggests less a disregard for the law than an inability to comply. In those industries, the minimum wage already amounts to roughly 87 percent of the median wage, leaving little room to absorb additional costs.

The consequences extend beyond corporate balance sheets. Faced with mounting labor expenses, many small businesses are turning to kiosks, self-service systems and robots. Entry-level jobs often disappear first.

The timing could hardly be worse. Permanent employment recently declined for the first time in more than 26 years, with much of the weakness concentrated among workers in their 20s and 30s. More than 500,000 university graduates are unemployed, a level not seen since the pandemic years.

Public finances are hardly immune. Because unemployment benefits are pegged to the minimum wage, sharp increases in the statutory wage floor feed directly into welfare spending. Last year's jobless benefits reached a record 17.5 trillion won, while the employment insurance fund has fallen deep into deficit.

The system itself has struggled to adapt. The Minimum Wage Act has permitted industry-specific rates since 1988, but the provision has been used only once. Labor groups fear differentiated wages would stigmatize certain occupations and worsen labor shortages.

Those concerns deserve respect. Yet mechanical equality can produce distortions of its own when economic conditions vary so widely. A nation that prides itself on technological sophistication should not assume that identical rules automatically guarantee fairness.

Neither freezing wages nor imposing large increases offers a durable answer. A more sensible approach would be to start pilot programs in the most vulnerable sectors, accompanied by targeted tax relief, productivity-enhancing support for microbusinesses and welfare reforms less dependent on the minimum wage itself.

Every summer brings another season of familiar arguments. Rituals have their place, but they are poor substitutes for adaptation.

South Korea's challenge is no longer choosing between labor and management. It is adapting institutions to an economy of widening disparities, while recognizing that social protection cannot rest indefinitely on the payrolls of private employers.

(END)